Actually there are two definitions:
Slang;
1. A word to be used in coalition with the female genitalia
2. A malicious or lewd woman
In the first sense it has been used in the english vocabulary for hundreds of years. So this means that because of the culture, it is okay to say this word without it being as severly taken. I can understand the logic behind saying that durrgoatory terms based on ethnicity can be used by one of the same and not blown out of proportion, but where was the lapse between traditional english and what we speak. Try going to Japan and calling somebody Baka, which means stupid. you would be luckky if you didn't get in a fist fight. I am not defending these words, I simply want to know, where these durogatory terms come from, and what makes them so bad. Is the entire american culture so cravingly PC that the sensitivity levels have made driven us to the edge of litigation no matter what word somebody uses. Or is it that there is such a difference between cultures that the words being exchanged between an american, and a Scot have been twisted by one person to form them into an offensive juncture in the common intelligent vocabulary of dignified people¿
Slang;
1. A word to be used in coalition with the female genitalia
2. A malicious or lewd woman
In the first sense it has been used in the english vocabulary for hundreds of years. So this means that because of the culture, it is okay to say this word without it being as severly taken. I can understand the logic behind saying that durrgoatory terms based on ethnicity can be used by one of the same and not blown out of proportion, but where was the lapse between traditional english and what we speak. Try going to Japan and calling somebody Baka, which means stupid. you would be luckky if you didn't get in a fist fight. I am not defending these words, I simply want to know, where these durogatory terms come from, and what makes them so bad. Is the entire american culture so cravingly PC that the sensitivity levels have made driven us to the edge of litigation no matter what word somebody uses. Or is it that there is such a difference between cultures that the words being exchanged between an american, and a Scot have been twisted by one person to form them into an offensive juncture in the common intelligent vocabulary of dignified people¿